Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the FINRA exam with our comprehensive quiz. Study with detailed flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Enhance your understanding and get ready for your test!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


In which situation is an employee allowed to trade on information without violating insider trading laws?

  1. Independent analyst discusses potential earnings drops with the employee

  2. Employee learns from neighbor about a government contract

  3. Spouse discloses overheard details about potential acquisitions

  4. Coworker shares details from a conversation about a class action lawsuit

The correct answer is: Independent analyst discusses potential earnings drops with the employee

The situation where an employee is allowed to trade on information without violating insider trading laws occurs when an independent analyst discusses potential earnings drops with the employee. In this context, the information shared is derived from an independent analysis and is likely publicly accessible, meaning it does not fall under the category of material nonpublic information. As long as the employee does not receive confidential or nonpublic information that could influence investment decisions, their actions would be in compliance with insider trading regulations. In contrast, the other scenarios involve instances where the information could be categorized as nonpublic or confidential, which could lead to potential insider trading violations. For instance, learning about a government contract from a neighbor or overhearing details about acquisitions or a lawsuit involves obtaining privileged information that is not available to the general public, putting those trades in a gray area concerning legality. Thus, trading based on these types of information would violate insider trading laws.